Family, Health, and Entertainment for Nurses
allnurses Network: allnurses.com | Nursing Jobs | Nursing Books | Newsletter
Family, Health, and Entertainment
Home Central News US Politics Blogs Articles Recreation Pets
Picks Help

World News & Current Events /

Strategy for Victory



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have 406,015 members! Join today to learn, network, laugh, and share with nurses.

Aug 04, 2004 06:37 PM

Strategy for Victory

by Mkue

Wednesday, June 02, 2004
President Bush’s Strategy for Victory In the War on Terror


Today, the President discussed his strategy for victory in the larger War on Terror – describing a clash of political visions between terrorists who want to impose a future of darkness across the Middle East, and America’s vision of liberty and respect for human dignity.

Just as events in Europe determined the outcome of the Cold War, events in the Middle East will set the course of the War on Terror:

If the Middle East is abandoned to dictators and terrorists, it will be a constant source of violence and alarm – exporting killers of increasingly destructive power to attack America and other free nations.

If the Middle East grows in democracy, prosperity, and hope, the terrorist movement will lose its sponsors, lose its recruits, and lose the festering grievances that keep terrorists in business.

The stakes of this struggle are high – the future security and peace of our country – and success in this struggle is our only option. To make America safer, the President is pursuing a strategy that calls for:
1) Using every available tool to disrupt, dismantle, and destroy terrorists and their organizations;
2) Denying terrorists places of sanctuary and support and preventing the emergence of terrorist-controlled states;
3) Using all elements of national power to deny terrorists the chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons they seek; and
4) Working for freedom and reform in the broader Middle East, stopping the flow of recruits into the terrorist movement by offering a real and hopeful alternative.

All four elements of this strategy are being applied and tested in Iraq. America removed a state sponsor of terror with a history of using weapons of mass destruction. We now face al-Qaida associates like Zarqawi who seek to hijack Iraq’s future.

Our coalition is determined – and the Iraqi people have made it clear: Iraq will remain in the camp of freedom. As recent developments have shown, the Iraqi people are moving forward to achieve democracy.

Iraq now has a designated prime minister, along with a president and two deputy presidents, who will lead a government of 33 ministers that will take office immediately in preparation for transfer of full sovereignty on June 30. America and Great Britain are now working with the UN Security Council and Iraq’s new leaders on a resolution that will endorse the sovereign government of Iraq and urge other nations to actively support it.

The United States and our allies, working with the United Nations, will help Iraq’s new government prepare for national elections by January of 2005.

Many brave Iraqis have stepped forward to fight for their own freedom, and they are working closely with US and coalition forces to disband illegal militia, defeat terrorists, and secure the safe arrival of Iraqi democracy.

The enemy knows the stakes as well as we do, and they will try to use violence to reverse gains made in Iraq. But our coalition is prepared, our will is strong, and neither Iraq’s new leadership nor the United States will be intimidated by thugs and assassins.
http://www.gop.com/news/read.aspx?ID=4258


All four elements are being tested in Iraq now at this time.

mkue


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
 
Reply
9 Comments
No. 1
Old Aug 04, 2004, 06:46 PM

Turkey-Iraq Businessmen Friendship Association President Mehmet Emin Deger announced earlier today that a Turkish truck driver, Selahattin Turan, was kidnapped yesterday evening (August 3) along with his truck.

"My friends from Zaho called me and informed me that a truck strayed from a convoy protected by American troops and was kidnapped. We have not been able to reach the driver, Selahattin Turan, despite all our efforts," explained Deger.

Turkish truck driver kidnapped



The strategy's not working
Top
 
No. 2
Old Aug 04, 2004, 06:54 PM

Ramadi - The governor of Iraq's restive Al-Anbar province resigned on Wednesday after three of his sons were released by their kidnappers on condition he quit.

Abdel Karim Berges told AFP he resigned after his sons, aged 15 to 30, were freed in Fallujah following one week in captivity.

He paid no ransom, but bowed to the kidnappers' demand that he leave office, said the governor.

Ramadi's chief administrator Mohammed Abed Awad has taken over his duties.

The sons were kidnapped by gunmen who barged into and torched the governor's family home in Ramadi while he was at work.

Ramadi is the main city in the mainly Sunni Muslim province of Al-Anbar, which also includes the flashpoint city of Fallujah where US troops have come under persistent attack and loyalty to Saddam Hussein still runs high.



Iraqi governor quits


It's still not working.
Top
 
No. 3
Old Aug 04, 2004, 06:57 PM

Fierce gunbattles broke out Wednesday between Iraqi police and militants in the northern city of Mosul, killing 12 Iraqis and wounding 26 others, officials said.

Dozens of masked men with assault rifles and rocket propelled grenade launchers moved through the streets in the Bab al-Toub area of the northern Iraqi city Wednesday afternoon, witnesses said.

Soon after, police headed to the area and a gunbattle, punctuated by explosions, broke out, witnesses said. Police blocked off roads in the neighborhood, and shopowners closed their businesses.

The U.S. military said the violence was part of a series of attacks in the city, including a grenade attack that hit a home, a shooting at a police station and a roadside bomb attack on a U.S. convoy.

The fighting killed 12 people and injured 26 others, according to Mahir Salam, an official at al-Junhouri Hospital in Mosul.

In response to the violence, the provincial government imposed a curfew on the city and banned anyone from shooting there without official authorization.

The afternoon gunbattle was sparked when "a group of thieves and terrorists who tried ... to attack a bank in the city," said Hazem Jalawi, spokesman for the governate of Nineveh, which includes Mosul. "The police and National Guard members confronted those armed men and killed some. Those armed men tried also to attack some government installations, but they were stopped by security forces."

In addition to the fighting, other attacks Wednesday in Mosul, 225 miles north of Baghdad, included a rocket-propelled grenade attack by militants that hit a home in the northern part of the city, said Capt. Angela Bowman, a U.S. Army spokeswoman in Mosul.

The was also a drive-by shooting at a police station in eastern Mosul, she said. And a roadside bomb targeted a U.S. convoy in the city center, she said. No U.S. troops were killed, she said.

Jalawi blamed the violence on people from outside Mosul who were trying to start "a wave of looting in the city."


Fighting in Mosul kills 12


Well these people sure aren't hiding in any caves.
Top
 
No. 4
from Mkue
Old Aug 04, 2004, 07:06 PM

Judging by your articles Sharon..Looks like President Bush is right.. there is a "clash between political visions between terrorists who want to impose a future of darkness across the Middle East"

mkue
Top
 
No. 5
from movealong
Old Aug 04, 2004, 08:14 PM

To sum up what Bush has done: In Iraq we have done what bin Laden could not have hoped for. We invaded an oil-rich Muslim Nation in the heart of the ME. Which was exactly the type of imperial adventure that bin Laden predicted was the US long term goal n the region. Bingo! Bush did it.

Then, we deposed the leader (Saddam) that bin Laden depised, ignited the Sunni's and the Shia's to join together ( something Bush banked on never happening:wrong), and got them into a fundamentalist fevor.

Iraq is much more open to terrorism in a way that it was not before we invaded. The lack of central authority makes it more amendable to terrorists.

We haven't gotten rid of Al-Queda leadership in Afghanistan because we drew resources from there to Iraq. Only 20,000 troups are in Afghan, a country the size of Texas, and almost 50% larger than Iraq, where we have 140,000 troops ( and even 140,000 have not been enough to create stability.)

And to date: we have 3 cities on heightened alert and are worried about terrorist activites around the time of election. Recent intelligence is showing that they are much more sophistated than we thought.

If we would have stayed focused on Afghan, and wiped out more of Al-Queda forces there, things might be a great deal different today.
Top
 
No. 6
Old Aug 04, 2004, 08:18 PM

..............but hey, so many feel so much safer!!!!
Top
 
No. 7
from Mkue
Old Aug 05, 2004, 05:26 AM

Originally Posted by movealong
If we would have stayed focused on Afghan, and wiped out more of Al-Queda forces there, things might be a great deal different today.
Things might be different today if we had done a lot of things differently..starting in 1993 when we were first attacked by Al-qaeda. And if Saddam had complied with weapons inspections things would be different. Much different.
Top
 
No. 8
from movealong
Old Aug 05, 2004, 01:51 PM

"In a March 1992 letter to Congress, Secretary Cheney defended the status quo and objected to proposed intelligence reform legislation, particularly the DNI position. 'The roles of the Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence have evolved in a fashion that meets national, departmental and tactical intelligence needs,' Cheney wrote. The intelligence reform proposals 'would seriously impair the effectiveness of this arrangement by assigning inappropriate authority to the proposed Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who would become the director and manager of internal DoD activities that in the interest of efficiency and effectiveness must remain under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense,' he wrote.…Secretary Cheney successfully torpedoed the initiative with his warning that 'I would recommend that the President veto [the measure] if [it] were presented to him in its current form.'...Cheney's unyielding opposition stifled the first initiative for post-Cold War intelligence reform. As a result, we now face many of the same problems, and the same proposed solutions, more than a decade later."
Top
 
No. 9
from Mkue
Old Aug 05, 2004, 03:30 PM

Do you have a link for the above post?

mkue
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
90 members
1,230 guests
1,320

3

The nanny state is arriving

0

Nurses, Fair Elections Advocates Deliver Disinfectant to...

8

Teacher uses the word "Loser" to bond with his...

1

'Vaccines court' rejects mercury-autism link in 3 test cases

1

Erasing Jefferson?

12

This is a reasonable, responsible plan. Don’t let anyone...

11

Sen. Reid tells off the GOP leadership

48

Limbaugh to leave US if Health Care Reform passes

6

Victory in Iraq

13

Only 4% say health care should not be changed


3

Spring Break, a Mothers Perspective

2

The Magic of Kleenex

0

Learning What It Means To Be Deaf

8

Good Ole Boy Medicine

0

Creating Documents to Promote Patient & Family Guidance: A...

1

I'm not to old to miss a conspiracy

9

Watching Fox AND not vaccinating?! Who am I?

0

Dai Bao's slim fit theory

20

If I could see you one last time... This is what I would...

1

Ninety-nine Percent Spirit




Sponsored Links

Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)



Site Map | Terms Of Service | Privacy | Advertise | Contact Us | Newsletter | Copyright © 1996-2010 allnurses.com INC